West Asia Crisis squeezes margins for Indian leather goods manufacturers

The prolonged geopolitical conflict in West Asia is casting a long shadow over India’s leather and footwear sector, exposing micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) to compounded cost burdens and persistent logistics disruptions. For an industry that relies on precise forward-planning and global supply chains, the resurgence of conflict has injected renewed volatility into an already fragile post-pandemic recovery.

In an interview with Leather News World, Sanjay Leekha underlined the seriousness of the situation. He stated that the conflict’s long duration is severely taxing operational margins. According to Leekha, the primary pressure point stems from steep price rise in petroleum-linked inputs, including essential tanning chemicals, specialized synthetic linings, and structural reinforcements. Because export contracts in the fashion and footwear trade are typically priced six to nine months in advance, manufacturers are forced to absorb these sudden cost spikes without the ability to pass them on to international buyers.

Logistics Bottlenecks and Margin Compression

Beyond raw material inflation, supply chain logistics have deteriorated significantly. The industry, which maintains a substantial import footprint for specialized components and wet-blue leathers, is contending with severe freight delays and acute container shortages across both air and sea routes. Delivery timelines for crucial raw materials have lengthened, while outbound shipments face delayed schedules and escalating freight rates.

These external shocks have been further complicated by domestic policy dynamics. MSMEs in key Northern manufacturing hubs, such as Haryana and Uttar Pradesh, have recently absorbed mandatory minimum wage revisions of up to 30%. While fair compensation remains essential for worker welfare, Leekha underlined that wage increases occurring along with unbudgeted freight and material costs have weaken the sector’s export competitiveness. For labour-intensive manufacturing units operating on slim margins, mid-term fiscal interventions from the central government, such as targeted wage support or direct export incentives, are increasingly vital.

FTAs and Competitiveness

India’s ambitious $15-billion export target for the leather and footwear sector over the next five years remains achievable, but it hinges on fundamental structural reforms. While landmark Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) signed with key global economies have opened unprecedented market access, trade deals alone cannot bridge the operational gap on the factory floor, said Leekha.

To fully leverage these trade corridors, Indian manufacturers must drive productivity improvements across the board. Skilling initiatives need to be expanded systematically across all operational tiers, from shop-floor technicians to supervisory and managerial staff. Enhancing ground-level competitiveness requires upgrading shop-floor processes, adopting modern tooling, and fostering a culture of operational efficiency.

Environmental Norms and Compliance

Sustainability and environmental compliance present another major structural shift for legacy manufacturing hubs like Kanpur. As global buyers demand stricter environmental standards and traceable supply chains, MSMEs face considerable capital and regulatory hurdles. Leekha advocates for comprehensive institutional backing to aid labour-intensive clusters in meeting international norms. Streamlining environmental compliance through improved ease of doing business, establishing shared testing infrastructure, and introducing dedicated technology modernization schemes are critical steps to prevent smaller units from being priced out of global markets, he added.

Similarly, addressing international scrutiny around supply chain compliance, particularly forced labour allegations raised by major Western importers, requires proactive transparency. While Indian manufacturers maintain fair labour practices, global trade standards increasingly evaluate the origin of imported inputs, such as raw or semi-processed leather sourced from third countries. By establishing rigorous input auditing and maintaining transparent supply chains, the Indian leather industry has successfully defended its standing, preserving competitive tariff structures in key export destinations like the United States.

Sustaining this momentum will essentially require a synchronized effort: robust policy backing from the government paired with structural modernization across India's MSME manufacturing clusters.
—-